Purpose: The goal of the study was an assessment of the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted images (DWI)
and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in distinguishing local recurrence (LR)
of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from benign conditions after partial nephrectomy.
Material and methods: Thirty-nine patients after partial nephrectomy for solid RCC were enrolled in the study. Patients
were followed up using MRI, which included DWI sequence (b = 800 s/mm2). All patients with MRI features of LR were included in the main group (n = 14) and patients without such features – into the group of comparison (n = 25).
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of suspicious lesions were recorded. In all patients with signs of locally recurrent RCC, surgical treatment was performed followed by pathologic analysis.
Results: The mean ADC values of recurrent RCC demonstrated significantly higher numbers compared to benign fibrous tissues and were 1.64 ± 0.15 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.02 ± 0.26 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001). The mean ADC values of RCCs’ LR and benign post-op changes in renal scar substantially differed from mean ADC values of healthy kidneys’ parenchyma; the latter was 2.58 ± 0.05 × 10-3 mm2/s (p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the use of ADC with a threshold value of 1.28 × 10-3 mm2/s allowed us to differentiate local recurrence of RCC from benign postoperative changes with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and accuracy: AUC = 0.980 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The apparent diffusion coefficient of DWI of MRI can be used as a potential imaging marker for the diagnosis of local recurrence of RCC.

the combined application of long non-coding RNAs (PCA3, DLX1, HOXC6, TMPRSS2:ERG) for obtaining the most accurate method of detection of PCa has not yet been comprehensively investigated.
Methods: In total 240 persons were included in the retrospective study. Among them were 150 patients with confirmed PCa, 30 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, 30 patients with active chronic prostatitis and 30 healthy volunteers. In all patients, the urine samples were collected prior to biopsy or treatment. Polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription was performed to detect the expression level of PCA3, HOXC6, DLX1 and the presence of the TMPRSS2:ERG transcript.
Results: PCA3 was detected in urine samples in all cases. Using a PCA3 score of 56 allowed the differentiation between PCa and all other cases with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 96% (p < 0.001) while a PCA3 score threshold value of 50 resulted in a differentiation between clinically significant PCa (ISUP grades 2–5) and all other cases with a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 93% (p < 0.001). The TMPRSS2:ERG expression in urine was detected exclusively in the group of patients with PCa and only in 16% of all cases.
Conclusions: PCA3 score detected in urine demonstrated moderate sensitivity and good specificity in differentiation between PCa and non-PCa and high sensitivity and specificity in differentiation between clinically significant PCa and non-PCa.